> ## Documentation Index > Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.mezzamine.com/llms.txt > Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further. # Mining Needs to Scale, but Lacks Financing > Bitcoin mining is the network's security layer, yet the financing to scale it does not exist at the scale required. Two fundamental gaps define the current state of Bitcoin's financial infrastructure. Mining, the economic activity that secures the network, lacks the capital tools to scale. And Bitcoin itself lacks a native mechanism for productive yield. These are connected problems, and their resolution is the foundation of a credit economy for Bitcoin. ## Security scales with capital expenditure Bitcoin mining is the operating and security layer of the Bitcoin network. The network's security scales with hashrate, hashrate scales with capital expenditure, and the financial infrastructure to fund that expenditure does not exist at the scale required. Without accessible financing, only the largest operators can expand, concentrating mining power and weakening the decentralization that underpins Bitcoin's security model. ## Forced selling amplifies downturns This fragility also amplifies Bitcoin's downside volatility. In bear markets, stressed miners are forced to sell BTC to service USD-denominated debt, meet margin calls, or cover operating costs. This forced selling adds downward pressure to an already declining market, pushing more miners below breakeven and triggering further liquidations. Mining distress accelerates the price declines that caused it. ## Existing instruments are misaligned The financing instruments that do exist are structurally misaligned with mining economics. * **Currency mismatch.** Miners earn in BTC but owe in USD, so a price decline becomes a solvency event. * **Collateral calls at the worst moment.** BTC-overcollateralized structures demand additional collateral when borrower margins are thinnest. * **Capital that cannot size to the need.** Even where collateral can be met, the capital available against BTC alone cannot size to the expenditure required to keep pace with network difficulty growth. These failure modes compound: traditional mining loans expose lenders to unhedged price risk backed by collateral that deteriorates at the same time the borrower loses the ability to repay. ## The collateral that goes uncounted Underlying all of this is a narrower problem. Credit markets do not treat mining hardware as collateral, so a miner's largest productive asset carries no borrowing capacity. Lending is done against Bitcoin alone, at 150% or more of principal, which prices the absence of any other acceptable security. Machines have gone unfinanced because ASIC value falls at the same time the borrower's ability to repay falls. A lender secured by hardware would be seizing an asset whose price is collapsing for the same reason the loan defaulted. Solving that correlation is what allows a fleet to be underwritten as collateral, and it is the function of the program hedge described in [How It Works](/welcome/how-it-works).